Today's Date:
Contact Us
About Us
Family Ministries
Social Ministries
Official Documents
Documents on the CFC Crisis
Downloads on the CFC Crisis
Recognition by the Clergy
Support from the Community
Audio Tracks Downloads
Sharings & Testimonies
Schedule of Events
Treasury of Prayers
Photo Gallery
Site Map
"The Signs of the Times"
Pro-lifers fight back ..... through legislation and modern technology.
Texas House votes to require women to see sonogram image of unborn child before abortion

Matthew Cullinan Hoffman Wed Mar 09 19:08 EST Abortion

AUSTIN, March 9, 2011 ( - The Texas House has joined the Senate to require women to see a sonogram image of their unborn child before undergoing an abortion, in a 107-42 vote held yesterday.

The legislation would require women to receive and view the image between 24 and 72 hours before an abortion, and listen to the heartbeat as well.

Governor Rick Perry, who fast-tracked the bill by making it an “emergency item” for the current legislative session, warmly hailed its passage.

“I commend the Texas House for passing this legislation, which bolsters our efforts to protect life by ensuring Texans are fully informed when considering such an important decision,” said Perry in a press release. “The decision to choose life becomes clear when someone has access to all the information and I look forward to this important legislation reaching my desk very soon.”

While the House version requires the sonogram for all women seeking an abortion, the Senate version makes an exception in rape and incest cases. It also requires only a two hour period between the sonogram and the abortion. The main sponsor of the Senate version says that although he supports the stronger House version, he believes it cannot pass in the more liberal upper chamber.

If one of the two bills is signed into law, Texas will join 17 other states with abortion sonogram legislation, Reuters reports. The bill has failed in two previous votes in 2007 and 2009, but its prospects are better this year with a stronger Republican legislative majority.

Texas already requires women seeking an abortion to be made aware of information about abortion alternatives (see the Texas “Woman’s Right to Know” informational pamphlet here and abortion alternatives resource directory here.

The Abortion Advantage abortion centre, for example, meets the legal requirement by stating on its website, “The state law does not require that you view the materials- you have the right to refuse the information. It requires that we inform you of the materials and how you may obtain them.” If you choose to view the materials you may do so by CLICKING HERE: Texas Dept. of Health - A Woman’s Right to Know Act - HB15.

Minnesota GOP leaders introduce fetal-pain abortion ban despite veto threat

Peter Smith | Wed Mar 09 14:52 EST | Abortion

ST. PAUL, Minnesota, March 9, 2011 ( – Pro-life leaders have introduced legislation in both chambers of the Minnesota state legislature that would ban abortion after 20 weeks gestation on the basis that an unborn child feels pain by that point.

Sen. Gretchen Hoffman (R-Vergas) and Rep. Mary Liz Holberg (R-Lakeville) each introduced the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act in the state Senate and House of Representatives. The bill is premised on medical evidence that suggests an unborn child is capable of experiencing pain at 20 weeks since conception, if not earlier.

“For far too long, Minnesota’s abortionists have been inflicting unconscionable suffering on unborn babies by killing them when they are already extraordinarily developed and pain-sensitive,” said Scott Fischbach, Executive Director of Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life (MCCL). “It is illegal to treat animals in such a brutal way; this bill will finally protect unborn children at 20 weeks and older from the torturous pain of abortion.”

Modeled on the fetal pain abortion ban enacted in Nebraska, the proposed law requires abortionists to perform tests and determine the gestational age of an unborn child before committing an abortion.

The proposed Minnesota law only allows an exception if an abortionist certifies that continuing pregnancy carries a serious risk of death or “substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.” The law specifically excludes emotional or psychological factors from being considered.
The measure also specifies that an abortionist ending a pregnancy after 20 weeks gestation must actually try to deliver the unborn baby in a way that gives the child the best opportunity to survive outside the womb. Only if delivery or other methods to save the unborn child’s life “pose a greater risk either of the death of the pregnant woman or of the substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function” would abortion be permitted.

The measure says abortionists who violate the law may face both civil and criminal penalties. Abortionists who intentionally or recklessly violate the law would face felony charges.

The bills also provide for a legal defense fund to which both the legislature and private citizens may contribute.

However, the bill is staunchly opposed by Democrat-Farmer-Labor Gov. Mark Dayton, who has promised to veto the legislation if it passes both chambers of the GOP-controlled legislature.

“I can assure you that nothing as extreme that violates that basic fundamental right - and it is a Constitutional right as established by the United States Supreme Court - will be enacted with my signature,” said Dayton, according to the Minnesota Star-Tribune. “It will not happen here in Minnesota.”

While Republicans control the legislature, the Star-Tribune reported that several GOP sources say they are hoping pro-life DFLers would give them the two-thirds majorities in both chambers to override Dayton’s veto.

"For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain." (Phil 1:21)
Copyright 2008 Couples for Christ Foundation, Inc.
Apartelle 12, Star Mall, Edsa corner Shaw Blvd.
Mandaluyong City 1550, Philippines
Tel. Nos. +63(2) 718-2213 * Fax No. +63(2) 718-2213
CFC-FFL Webmaster